Wimminz – celebrating skank ho's everywhere

July 21, 2013


There are many, many, many things in life that you get a default answer to.

Paedophilia, yes, it is just wrong, end of discussion.

God help you if you want to discuss it intellectually,to wonder aloud why the label is applied, completely incorrectly, to 21 year olds having mutually consensual and loving sexual relationships with 15 years and 11 months olds.rideolsen

God help you if you wonder aloud that for much of English history the age of consent was 12 and there was no paedophilia to speak of, now it is 16/18 there is apparently loads of it…. just as there was no illegal homosexual sex before homosexual sex was made illegal.

God help you if you wonder aloud at the imposition of a law making something quite common suddenly arbitrarily illegal, if she is 5,843 days old I am a rapist and paedo, if she is 5,844 days old we can nip up to Gretna Green and get married.

Where does the State get off in passing laws that suddenly render apparently common enough behaviours illegal, surely this is against everything the state itself was founded to preserve.

What comes next, laws banning the wearing of primary colours?

The real point of this post, and, now that the stage is set, another default answer that must not be questioned or discussed, is Men and their abducted by the state / skank ho ex kids, specifically the boy children, because the girl children and just sluts in training… oh noes… we’re back to the paedo thing again..

But here we are, ask any deadbeat dad who does not have contact with his sons, and you’ll get the stock answer, I should be there for them, teaching them, guiding them, doing manly things with them.

But is it the fucking truth?

About now I am as popular with deadbeat dads as a “paedo” admiring the tits on a 14 year old chick in a topless beach…

Oh I know, there are all sorts of things I *could* be doing with and for my absent sons, all sorts of things I feel I *should* be doing with and for my absent sons, yadda yadda yadda

But the unspeakable question.

What’s in it for me?

Did you cringe reading that? Did it make you feel guilt, the same way looking at the pic above and thinking she is pretty…

Is me explaining how my life is easier, more money and free time and all that jazz, somehow reminiscent of “if they are old enough to bleed, they are old enough to breed”, you cannot counter it directly, but it is just WROOOONNNG… MMKAYY.. so DROP IT…

However, no pubescent teen virgins were harmed by this discussion, just as no absent sons were harmed by this discussion, so the only thing this discussion is a threat to is the whole concept of the unspeakable.

Paedophilia is a good place to start, in your creation of an unspeakable, cannibalism is a better taboo, but, you cannot potentially link 75% of day to day activity for 99.999% of the population with potential cannibalism, it just doesn’t fly.

Of course you then have to set the boundaries in such a way that 99.9% of people are tempted, because you need that fucking guilt to get them to shut the fuck up when someone else is accused, so there is no good to be had from making the minimum age at which you can have sex 7, like cannibalism, 99.999% of the population wouldn’t be tempted anyway, so you have to set it at a ludicrously high level, biologically and historically speaking, see homosexuality, a young boy of 16/7 could join the army and get his ass blown off by flying lead and HE, but he couldn’t consent to a loving sexual encounter with another man unless he was 21.

Ok, now you have a universally reviled act, that you have simultaneously engineered to be something that, within the broadest terms of the definition, 99.999% of the population are biologically hard-wired to find “interesting” at the very least, so you have your guilt, which gives you your control… Neimoller anyone?

Next step?

Well, you mission creep that fucker.


Now I have been online since fidonet and the BBS days, long before there was an internet, last time I accidentally came across some paedo porn? Must have been about 1996… so this isn’t exactly a pandemic of filth that needs urgent attention, it’s just mission creep, making ever more people feel guilty.

Let’s be honest, who is going to stand up and say “Hang on a minute, do we actually need any more fucking useless laws on this subject?” nobody, you filthy paedolover and apologist you…

Want to marginalise some fucker, no worries, just label them a paedo, or a deadbeat dad. Job done.

Actual paedophilia is of course still going on, and it is a great tool for blackmail and political control, so it is not actual paedophilia, or active drug use, or active anything that is ever targeted, it is all about guilt, which is all about control.

So, you have systems in place that arguably both;

  1. do nothing whatsoever to combat the alleged problem
  2. just happen to be a very effective means of coercion and control for the 99.999% of the population who were never tempted by the alleged problem in the first place.

Pure coinckydink, of course, only a paedo or terr’rist would suggest that in fact the REAL goals and the actual outcomes were the only game in town, and the stated goals were just a methodology, social engineering.

Now tell me again, what is in it for me to become actively involved in raising my abducted by the skank ho ex and State sons…. they already have my fucking DNA

Being brutally honest with you, if they read and memorise this blog, that’s about all else I can give them.

My skills, well, bit like grandad teaching me how to make buggy whips, not relevant to life in 2013 innit.

If the remaining 99.99999% of me feeling bad about somehow letting my son’s down is just social engineering, then by definition it is alien to me, and I am better off rejecting it, and so are my sons, so if I have contact with them it will be BECAUSE of the social engineering, and as such I would be infected by it, and my proximity to them would infect them.

Hilariously. This is the exact argument the state uses WRT sexual abuse, that the abused go on to create more abusers.


Because it is a bell that cannot be un-rung in your mind.


November 10, 2012

The rule of Law

One of the first casualties when the wheels fall off the wagon is the rule of Law.

Innocent until proven guilty

That USED to mean something, but as every man who has been through the Secret Family Courts knows, it hasn’t meant anything for a long time.

So now we are presented with the sideshow spectacle of paedophilia in the upper echelons of the state, all apparently triggered by the death of one J Saville.

While I am the first to point out that our so called leaders are quisling scum, I have to say I find the rush to name everyone from Harriet Harman, Ted Heath etc on down as either paedos or paedo lovers more than a little disquieting.

“Innocent until proven guilty”, these people have not even had a mock trial in a secret family court to justify labelling them with these accusations, and the net result is yet more hysteria and pitchfork readying…

Look at THIS story, he was actually killed in 2008, and he is labelled as a paedo, despite the FACT that he clearly was not one, he had a conviction for underage sex with a girl of 15, which could well have been a case of he thought she was 16 or 17 etc, after all the charge was under age sex, not rape, and one conviction subsequent to that for assault, no doubt after someone called him a paedo, and he was guess what, a divorced dad of five kids.

The dead guy may have been an Ephebophile, but he was no paedophile.

Ephebophilia is not a crime.

The dead guy is also dead, not “innocent until proven guilty” and the pitchforks ruled the day.

Now, while on the one hand I have little sympathy for our elites caught up in this shit, because they had fuck all sympathy for all the father and children caught up in the secret family courts and the meat grinder of endemic false rape accusations, on the other hand I am intelligent enough to see where this is going…

Where it is going is a Police State, and if that is insufficient to put the proles back in their housing estates then it is headed for the breakdown of society, a la the French revolution.

Again, I will have no sympathy if everyone who ever walked through the doors of Parliament and their families has an appointment with madame guillotine, fuck you all, you didn’t give a fuck about me or us.


… and it is a big however, when the rule of law breaks down to this point everything and everyone becomes fair game, and malicious accusations fly around like rain, he made a pact with the devil, she is a witch, and those kids are demon-spawn.

And none of them will get “innocent until proven guilty”, and it becomes a blood letting purge.

There are no brakes on the system.

If you do research on the effects of the French Revolution now you fill find reams of opinion on the religious consequences, the financial consequences, the social consequences, the end of feudalism, the this the that the other.

What you won’t find is much data on how that decade affected the ability of your average guy in the street to buy a pair of boots, have a plough mended, fix a leaking roof, buy a loaf of bread, sharpen a knife, buy a spoon, send a letter 100 miles.

This was of course no real infrastructure at the end of the 1700’s, no motorways, no electric grid, no mobile phone network, and 95% of what anyone needed to live was produced within a day’s walk of where they lived.

Today the braying mob would do what we saw in New Orleans and recently in NY done by mother nature, which is take down the infrastructure, with the same results, sit around and wait for someone else to bail them out…. except there wouldn’t be anyone else to bail them out.

This then, is the trump card of the elites, they are betting everything they have, and everything we have, that they can keep a lid on this, that the situation can be “managed”, that we the proles will prefer a police state to anarchy.

It’s a lousy bet.

We the proles prefer something closer to justice than to injustice, and all they are offering are variations on the theme of injustice, with more injustice forecast for the future.

At its simplest it is the prisoner’s dilemma, but set aboard a two man plane, and when I say two man plane I mean a plane that takes two men to operate, and we are just about at the point where both pilots are convinced that any and all promises made by the other pilot are bullshit, the instant the wheels are on the ground they other pilot is going to kill you.

At its simplest innocent until proven guilty and the rule of law are all about one thing and one thing only, and that thing is trust.

When the trust has been squandered, as any man who has been through the wringer of the secret family courts or an FRA knows, it is gone forever and ain’t never coming back.

If my own psycho skank ho ex told me the sky was blue I would look up and check, and if it was I would get even more fucking suspicious.

Any route forwards from here that does not focus on rebuilding trust between the proles and the elite is now doomed to failure.

Sadly for us all, proles and elite alike, the only routes that do that are routes that have been dismissed as far too fucking ridiculous and personally ruinous for the elite. The only options they have left on the table now that the cat is out of the bag on so many levels, from the lack of any gold reserves anywhere to corruption and incompetence and now sexual deviance, all of which is protected from punishment of the guilty because the guilty are the elite, and therefore not guilty, and the proles are not the elite, and therefore are guilty, are zero sum options.

Image is that all ukranian babes are as hot and horny as fuck, reality is the picture above of a ukranian whore, who could have been as hot as fuck, if she wasn’t a two dollar whore.

Which is like saying Obama could have been a great leader, if he wasn’t a two dollar whore.

One is Image. One is Reality.

When they get too far apart the rule of law and innocent until proved guilty fall down between them and get smashed, and all you have left between you and the mob is the police state, and that is just moving Image and Reality even further apart, exacerbating the original fucking problem.



August 13, 2012

Paedo love

Following on from yesterday’s True love post.

NOTA BENE – I have deliberately chosen a tough and emotive subject. Not for any reason other than it is a tough and emotive subject, which makes it a very strong test of the logic of anything I say now.

When I say “paedo” above I do not mean the accusation leveled at men in family court in order to gain a non-molestation order and sole custody of the kids, nor do I mean older people having sex with younger people who are above the age of consent, neither do I mean those who find those who are sexually mature but below the age of consent attractive.

Specifically, I am talking about a subset of those who find pre-pubescent kids sexually attractive, and the subset I am talking about is the one that actually fucks those kids.

(Nota bene, I did not say “men”, because just as many are wimminz)

I make this clarification not so much to make a point of using the correct definition for a word, but to make sure we all know exactly what we are talking about, adults who fuck small children, for values of small children meaning under 10 years old.

Got that?

Do you think that said paedo can look at themselves in the mirror and feel either;

  1. the same thing YOU feel when you look in the mirror
  2. fear loathing disgust hate etc

Now this is a critical thinking test, are you able to separate your feelings for paedos from the quite separate question being asked here, the question of self perception.

I hope so, because if the claims about the prevalence of paedos and rapists are true then every single day paedos and rapists are making major life changing decisions on your behalf, the air traffic controller, the hospital blood lab tech, the 911 dispatcher, the insulin vendor, the insurance adjuster, the tax collector…

If you are capable of this piece of critical thinking, you’ll see that the answer to the question above is #1

The question of whether the person looking in the mirror sees someone who does wrong / bad things and hurts others is quite the separate question.

Human nature is to deny this, methinks the lady doth protest too much, as the victim of a malicious FRA I might want to think that my mental processes have nothing whatsoever in common with those of my psycho skank ho ex who made the FRA against me, I might want to think that, but it isn’t true.

I have far more in common with her, on the level of mental processes, that I have to differentiate between us… to be sure, those small differences are very important, but they don’t change the fact that most of my mental processes and hers are alike.

Critical thinking, it has to be so, or all these deviants like paedos and my psycho skank ho ex would self terminate, the fact that they don’t is proof that when they look in the mirror, what they feel isn’t that far from what you or I feel.

The stuff they don’t like, well, that is easy explained away by externalizing everything, in my psycho skank ho ex’s case everything will be my fault, and the fault of every other man she has ever known… in the case of the paedo it will also be externalized in exactly the same way.

And this, my friends, is the point of this little piece of critical thinking, the OUTCOMES may be different in the case of a paedo fucking a ten year old, my psycho skank ho ex making an FRA against me, and me deciding not to pay out on a bet I lost that my car was faster than yours down the strip, but the MENTAL PROCESSES are the same.

Here is another piece of critical thinking, does it matter to you if you get back to your car and the stereo is still in it, because;

  1. I did not steal it because it is morally wrong and do unto others etc
  2. I did not steal it because I don’t want to get caught and convicted and pay the consequences

It *might* matter if you know me personally, #1 makes me more suitable as a friend, but other wise?

Let’s go back to the paedo, but this time we are talking about the paedo that has the urges, but refuses to act on them, does it matter to you if;

  1. your kid is safe because the paedo knows that to act on those urges would be wrong and would injure an innocent child
  2. your kid is safe because the paedo doesn’t want to do 20 to life

Sure, tough question, because to answer it you have to question a whole load of basic stuff about YOUR life, because what you really want is a third option, where the paedo is segregated from society at birth, because that option means you do not have to analyse your own mental processes… you just want to look in the mirror like me and be OK with what you see.

So now we have two examples, (three if you include the FRA) the car stereo thief and the paedo, and while we WANT to separate these two as widely as possible, as we can see, the same mental processes and choices are present in both…. do I refrain because it is just plain wrong, or do I refrain because it will cost me personally?

Clearly, as I have discussed previously in standards, we all got em, re the porn sluts, relying on people refraining from doing bad stuff because it is just wrong doesn’t get us very far, because there are enough out there with enough different standards that sooner or later your path is going to cross someone who has wildly different standards to you.

They will do stuff that will hurt you, but to them, genuinely, they have done nothing wrong.

Enter codified and standard penalties and punishments.

Are you now driving 20 in a 20 limit because it is safer for the pedestrian if you should have an accident, or because you don’t want the fine and ticket and insurance increase?

Probably, like most humans, a bit of both, and the amount of each varies from day to day, but overall you always stay on this side of the line.

Go back to the car stereo thief and paedo, probably, in most cases, a bit of both, a varying amount each day, but overall they stay this side of the line.

Once you indulge in this bit of critical thinking, and grep that it is the MENTAL PROCESSES that we all share in common that are at work here, you are ready for the next step.

Quantitatively and qualitatively, it is much worse for society and the individuals concerned, if one paedo is pushed over the line from restraint to action, than if a car stereo thief is pushed over the line from restrain to action…. but at the MENTAL PROCESS level, it is the same thing, just a push from this state to this state, from the range 0.0 to 0.49, into the range from 0.5 to 1.0, the binary 0 to 1, from inaction to action, from did not to did.

You will probably object, how dare I compare jacking a stereo to raping a kid, which is a straw man argument, because the whole point is that I am not doing this… jacking the stereo and raping the kid are actions that take place after the binary shift from 0 to 1, I’m talking about what makes the binary shift in MENTAL PROCESSES from 0 to 1

200 years ago you would have been asking what the fuck I was on about, if I was discussing rape in the same breath as an adult being in a sexual relationship with a 12 year old, because the latter was quite legal..

The proof of what I am saying lies in the simple fact that making an FRA is now so routine that police do not even prosecute, except in the most egregious cases, eg where they themselves have been made to look like complete assholes by the FRA claimant.

Once this (bearing false witness) was considered a terrible crime, there is no commandment that thou shalt not have sex with 15 year olds, or 17 year olds if you are their teacher…

How to you create a set of circumstances that will promote the binary shift from 0 to 1 in MENTAL PROCESSES with regards to ;

  1. jacking stereos
  2. raping children
  3. making FRAs

The answers are of course quite simple, because we human being aren’t really that complex, and we don’t really think a lot about stuff before choosing an action

  1. make the penalties for jacking a stereo lower than the benefits to the potential thief, so create an environment where a stereo = a couple of small rocks of crack.
  2. make the definition of children ambiguous, by sexualising children as young as possible, kiddies beauty pageants, whores outfits for 6 year olds, padded brassieres for 8 year olds, and sidelining and ignoring all the quiet kids, while removing the traditional protections, the father of the household
  3. reward those who make them while emasculating those who they are made against
  4. In all of the above, the more you can make it happen, the more common you can make it, the easier it is to get the next person to flip that switch from 0 to 1, after all, everyone else is doing it…

So, here I sit….

False accused of rape, domestic violence, of wanting to fuck my own flesh and blood kids up the ass.

see above, two forces, 1 it’s morally wrong, 2 I get punished

If ever anything was going to push a man to cross a line it is the above, and yet I did nothing, not even enough for her to go to the police and claim fear… but, if you think that because the above accusations and the consequences of them were not enough to push me from 0 to 1 in the MENTAL PROCESSES that turn inaction from action in this case, then no changes were made in my mental processes, you would be totally wrong.

Not merely totally wrong, but FATALLY wrong, should your continued existence or welfare depend upon me making the “right” decision or doing the “right” thing.

If you think the changes made in other areas of my mental processes were to push thresholds closer to the boundary between action and inaction, you would also be totally wrong… it has pushed me the other way… MGTOW’s do not “see” wimminz and kids being mugged and raped and abused.

Now, if you have been able to control your revulsion at the subject matter, and follow the critical thinking, we are finally at the meat and potatoes of this post.

Asking me to go back to being a citizen, because it was all a big misunderstanding, a temporary blip of feminazi insanity, and frankly the world desperately needs engineers like yourself right now, write your own cheque… is gonna fall on stony fucking ground.

I cannot CTRL-Z undo the changes in my mental processes any more than a car stereo jacker can walk past a car with a top of the range Blaupunkt fitted and not see it, or a paedo can walk past a tots beauty pageant and not see the posters outside advertising it.

I must stress this analogy, all three examples above are examples of INACTION, things were seen, “opportunities” (whether right or wrong) were noted, and inaction was selected over action, the inaction potentials exceeded and overwhelmed the action potentials.

In a world that focuses on ACTION potentials, inaction potentials are the ash that chokes the fire.

I am no more likely than I was 5 years ago to rape my girlfriend, to beat her, to fuck my own kids up the ass, not just a case of binary 0 still being binary 0, but to three significant places 0.002 is now 0.001 and so far away from the 0.4999 tipping / rounding point as to be meaningless, approaching zero so closely as to be zero.

However, I am now binary 0 (inaction) where I abso-fucking-lutely would have been and indeed was binary 1 (action) where it comes to protecting my psycho skank ho ex from harm, and that has been extended to the secret family courts, police, and indeed wimminz and niggerz and the state in general.

And that should fucking terrify you, because though I say so myself, my personality and experiences and abilities made me one of those men who could get shit done, whatever the odds.

Shades of this ongoing story


All I see when I read the series of articles about this developing story is that I have yet to see a single mention of the dead girl’s biological father, or his thoughts and feelings… but I can guess the backstory.. and at the end of the day it was a girl killed, not a boy, so no big deal in the great scheme of things.

Just as the right thinking tend to reject everything about paedos, including denial of the 99% of mental processes that we share with all human beings, paedos included, the wimminz and niggerz will reject with horror everything I say here, and everything I am and everything I stand for, but I share 99% of mental processes with them.

That 1%, that wasn’t where I accepted responsibility for my own actions and deeds, I always did that, the really significant portion of that 1% is the bit where I “manned up” and accepted responsibility for the false and malicious allegations of my psycho skank ho ex, and the actions of the secret family courts, police, state, all of whom were following their own personal advancement agendas.

I manned up and smelled the fucking coffee and decided, inaction potential win the day;




Hope ya’ll like the bed you’ve made for yourselves, because you’ve utterly alienated those who could pull your balls out of the fire, and when I say “alienated” I mean I will listen to your pleas and entreaties after the last paedo has their wishes granted.

April 23, 2012

Notches on the bedpost

A mixed bag this week, one skank ho who openly admits that she cheated on her husband throughout her marriage wonders why I treat EVERYTHING she says, as though it is possibly / probably false… duh

And another for whom the bell finally tolls and the penny finally drops, you’re not just notches on a bedpost, it is that after three fucks most wimminz are unfuckable, my cock will not co-operate any further, so I must of necessity move on to the next skank ho.

Think about it bitches, all I am interested in is dumping my cum into your holes, for free, and even so THE BEST OF YOU  still can’t hold my attention or interest past three fucks.

Bitches have been drinking their own kool aid for so long and lying to themselves about what they really are for so long that there is no longer any signal left when talking with wimminz, it is all noise, and incidentally proof that 12 million monkeys will never type so much as one sonnet, much less the complete works of Shakespeare.

Whether it is secret family courts or wimminz rights or evil male sexual predators, bitches cannot and will not see that it is NEVER coincidental that those towns that are known for the worst excesses of secret family courts, social services and child welfare types are also the towns where the worst child abuse goes on and the highest profile paedophile cases come from, they just routinely put the cart before the horse and point at the excesses of the headline paedophile case as reason for their own existence, when in fact it has been the past decade plus of their own existence of complete power on the local scale that has bred the ideal hunting grounds for these evil predatory paedophiles, and has also bred the next generation of them.

Just as in the Vanessa George case, the skank ho who actually did all the physical sexual abuse, George herself, was given second billing to the guy who lives 200+ miles away who never touched a single child in the flesh, but who George was in electronic communication with.

Back in the day it was Fred and Rose West, again Fred got all the bad publicity, but they lived in Cromwell St, well known locally as the place to find whores and drugs, and less well known as the place where the local council routinely housed all their kids that had been seized from families and taken into care, when those kids reach 16 and ceased to be a source of revenue for said children’s services departments.

What could possibly go wrong?

What (address) could possibly express more cynicism and disdain for the now 16 year old kids?

What y’all have to watch out for is the only trick left in the bag is doubling down, and as times get harder they will keep doubling down.

You think you have your ass covered by signing up to Fetlife and finding that 22 year old submissive, you know, FROM HER FUCKING ADVERT FOR AN OLDER MAN, and hooking up with her?

When they double down and broaden consent to something that can be RETROACTIVELY RETRACTED BY A PANEL OF WIMMINZ AND NIGGERZ, you are as fucked as fucked can be, and jumping up and down in the dock trying to get her Fetlife advert admitted as evidence of your innocence, as opposed to being evidence of her vulnerability and proof of your evil predatory nature will only get your sentences increased for contempt of court.

No, far better that you talk to a local, and go down to the areas of town where the local social services dump all the kids as soon as they become 16 and cease being a source of revenue, with the whores and the dealers, and cruise for some young flesh… the young flesh in question has no illusions whatsoever about their status… your only problem is in fucking hand me downs from the same social services / child care services / family courts, because NONE of these 16 year olds are virgins, not even close, haven’t been for years, many years in some cases… just needs a fall guy, like you maybe, to take the rap and thus close the book on previous indiscretions… knowworrimean..

Seems you aren’t the only one who was out to carve a few notches on your bedpost… but you just sleepwalked into playing the game with the genuine feral article, and the real predators.

Doubling down, doubling down.

Vanessa George, Rose West, “Baby P“, they all represent mission and budget creep for the symbiont’s, and expansion of the incestuous and iniquitous pools of slime and corruption, far from being human tragedies, they are brand leading success stories.

The most chilling tales of all come from the mouths of hollow young people, the young girl who despite being 16 and a bit and fully physically a woman and with many of the tick boxes for attractiveness, a wagon load of viagra and a gallon on liquid nitrogen could not have gotten me hard for, not once they have uttered “You know that film Aliens, you know the bit about in space nobody can hear you scream, and the bit about they come at night, mostly, and the bit about game over man, yeah well that is what growing up in “care” is all about….

There are monsters, and they are human, and they are the ones who have been given and taken total power and control over our children and families.

Edit – and the fact that most of those involved in this system as a career are wimminz, and yet wimminz are supposed to be the protectors of youth / children / innocence… it is THIS role that the wimminz abandoned most eagerly, and NONE of them speak up to denounce their sisters, the total renunciation of all maternal and nurturing capacity, it is for this reason, more than any other, that I am done with treating wimminz as civilised and moral creatures… I am as slow and as dense as fuck, but even I can eventually learn a lesson if it is rammed into my head daily for decades.

April 19, 2012

A generation of young sluts..

Filed under: Wimminz — Tags: , , , , , , , — wimminz @ 12:21 pm

from the daily fail article

Actually, it is well worth a read… some selected red pill quotes

It’s like being in a virtual nightclub. Even though you don’t fancy some of the guys, you still like the attention.

sending revealing pictures to potential suitors these days is simply an expected part of flirting — ‘just part of the tease’

Researchers at the university found that one in ten 16 to 24-year-olds have used the internet to set up one-night stands with strangers.

As usual the article is all evil predatory male paedophiles and rapists using the interwebs to take advantage of these poor innocent victims, while trying to paper over the very obvious facts that these wimminz are deliberately going online and seeking out men to fuck…

and even so, the odd nugget of gold slips through the feminazi dialogue…

The University of Plymouth study was published just days after an inquest earlier this year heard that bullied teenager Simone Grice, 15, of Illogan, Cornwall, killed herself by leaping off a motorway viaduct after trying to bolster her self-esteem by meeting older men online. She is believed to have jumped after one person tried to sever contact with her, because she was under-age.

What’s that!!! The evil predatory rapist paedophile male SEVERS contact with the girl when he finds out that she is UNDERAGE,


Sounds like pretty decent, responsible, law abiding above board and self liberty preserving behaviour to me, odd how you can find that in this place which, as the whole basis of the article and the feminazi message it is trying to promote, is in fact a place infested with evil predatory rapist paedophile MEN…. very odd indeed…

And the “victim” in that case was so upset when a man acted decently, responsibly, law abidingly and openly with her when he caught her out in her lies about her age, that she went and KILLED HERSELF… this same man who would have been up on statutory rape charges if maybe he was not quite so decent, responsible, law abiding, open, and of course CAUTIOUS and SUSPICIOUS…

I particularly like the third quote from the top, because we all know positive responders to these sorts of things are low-ball, if you are in your twenties, it means there is a LOWBALL 10% chance your girlfriend has met random guys off the internet for sex… what chance relationship there?

None, as we again see in a little nugget of gold, the 40 random guys over the net…

(yeah, the true number is going to be FAR higher, trust me I know, the average is 25 different partners / hookups per year, she was doing this 5 years, so 125 guys, roughly in line with what we would expect, that the little slut, even when “being honest” is low-balling the numbers to a third of what they really are, and again experience will tell you a third is a fairly common amount for wimminz to low-ball such number by….)

… in that after her 5 years of trawling the internet for random cock, she tries twice for a “normal” steady relationship, and fails twice. who could possibly have predicted that.

You can’t go from scrambled eggs back to an egg in its shell and some milk in an udder.

In closing, times are getting tough in Greece, as I predicted for the west, already on the table in Greece is a total wipe out of all State benefits for single mothers and large families… as well as further decimation of the State itself, which is as always a mainly wimminz employer.

April 10, 2012

Bitches do NOT want equality.

In a classic and totally expected piece of feminazism, getting nasty creepy paedophile men out of teaching was win win for the wimminz, and their union, NASUWT, the union for WIMMINZ teachers.

And as sure as tick follows tock, the loss of all authority figures in schools, and their replacements with wimminz who routinely lie about everything in the workplace, and who are so arrogant that they will lie in front of the kids e.g. “couldn’t make it because 4b were being a nightmare” said in front of 4b, who were of course there at the time, and not being a nightmare…

So we now have a situation where most of the teachers are wimminz, and where they have taught the kids to make false accusations…. so now it affects a mainly wimminz profession, it becomes a problem, oh yeah.

From the article

You will see that since just 3% of allegations against teachers resulted in a criminal caution or conviction, which is half the rate for rape by the way, and most of these allegations against teachers will be sexual and / or violent in nature, they draw the conclusion that at least half of the allegations are malicious and nasty and want those who make such allegations punished severely under the law.

Sound familiar?

It won’t if you are a man falsely accused of rape.

So, while I might on another planet, having been the victim of a FRA myself, have some time for the point of view of TEACHERS in all this, since we are in reality talking about the experiences of WIMMINZ in all this, I am overcome with admiration for the kids, and I feel that a 3% conviction rate for these very very serious allegations, which are after all brought about by CHILDREN, who are after all, (raised in single mommy households) all sweet and innocence and light, is a fucking SCANDAL.

I think we should be naming these predatory paedophile teachers as soon as they are accused by little Johnny, 9, of inappropriately touching his shoulder or whatever, shaming them, and sending them to prison for a very long time… after all I will exactly echo the rhetoric used by the wimminz with regard to men who are falsely accused… tough shit, it is worth destroying your individual lives to keep these kids safe from harm

Fuck You All

It is time we protected these children.

You filthy predatory female teachers should all have your cunts cut out.

%d bloggers like this: