Self denial, self reproach, self recrimination.

There is a story in today’s daily fail about a woman who repeatedly raped a young boy, except if you click that link it is not worded that way, not reported that way, not prosecuted that way, nor was she sentenced that way….

And of course there is the cavalcade of men commenting along the lines of “phwoar, when I was a 15 year old boy I was / would have been up for fucking an older woman”

… which we are told by many in the MRA movement is wrong headed thinking, we must not think or talk like this… why the fuck not? After all, IT IS TRUE.

The only POSSIBLE reason to avoid talking or thinking like this is Blue Pill mangina niggerzdom, or worse still, adherence to the school of feminazism.

So why is such thinking prohibited? Because from there it is a VERY short and small step to go from “Many 15 year old boys are willing and eager to fuck older wimminz” to “Many 15 year old girls are willing and eager to fuck older men“, and that sort of thinking is prohibited, because the wimminz are never ever ever responsible for anything, ever, especially when they are, capische?

The Daily Fail article linked to says, in the banner heading, that the skank ho was jailed for, and I quote, “… jailed for having sex in a car…” unqote

There can, legally, have been NO SEX WHATSOEVER, as the boy was 15, a minor, and legally unable to give his consent, there for there was no sex, so the article heading is a lie, it was not sex it was rape…

But then again, if the article was headed with a banner that said a woman was jailed “for raping a boy in her car” etc, we would all be asking, quite correctly;

1. Why she was only sentenced to 18 months imprisonment.
2. Why she is only on the sex offenders register for 10 years.
3. Why her admitted use of facebook and a webcam to attempt to get access to other underage boys to rape was not seen as the signs of a dangerous and predatory paedophile.
4. Why there is no mention of the Coach/Bus hire company she and her husband own / run and the role it played, damn sure it has contracts that if not direct school run are taking children as fare paying passengers.
5. Why is her mangina / niggerz husband standing by this rapist.
6. Why her lawyers felt that claiming this “relationship” between this rapist and her rape victim “… may have compensated for shortcomings in her marriage” was an actual defence…